Volume 8, Issue 2, March 2020, Page: 20-29
Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Interior Beam Column Connection Subjected to Lateral Loading
Gemechu Abdissa, Department of Civil Engineering, Mizan-Tepi University, SNNPR, Tepi, Ethiopia
Received: Mar. 14, 2020;       Accepted: Mar. 30, 2020;       Published: Apr. 23, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajce.20200802.11      View  333      Downloads  220
Abstract
The beam column connection is the most critical zone in a reinforced concrete frame. The strength of connection affects the overall behavior and performance of RC framed structures subjected to lateral load and axial loads. The study of critical parameters that affects the overall joint performances and response of the structure is important. Recent developments in computer technology have made possible the use of Finite element method for 3D modeling and analysis of reinforced concrete structures. Nonlinear finite element analysis of reinforced concrete interior beam column connection subjected to lateral loading was performed in order to investigate joint shear failure mode in terms of joint shear capacity, deformations and cracking pattern using ABAQUS software. A 3D solid shape model using 3D stress hexahedral element type (C3D8R) was implemented to simulate concrete behavior. Wire shape model with truss shape elements (T3D2) was used to simulate reinforcement’s behavior. The concrete and reinforcement bars were coupled using the embedded modeling technique. In order to define nonlinear behavior of concrete material, the concrete damage plasticity (CDP) was applied to the numerical model as a distributed plasticity over the whole geometry. The study was to investigate the most influential parameters affecting joint shear failure due to column axial load, beam longitudinal reinforcement ratio, joint panel geometry and concrete compressive strength. The Finite Element Model (FEM) was verified against experimental test of interior RC beam column connection subjected to lateral loading. The model showed good comparison with test results in terms of load-displacement relation, cracking pattern and joint shear failure modes. The FEA clarified that the main influential parameter for predicting joint shear failure was concrete compressive strength.
Keywords
RC Beam Column Connection, Finite Element Model, Shear Strength, Joint Shear Failure, Crack Patterns
To cite this article
Gemechu Abdissa, Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Interior Beam Column Connection Subjected to Lateral Loading, American Journal of Civil Engineering. Vol. 8, No. 2, 2020, pp. 20-29. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20200802.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Park, S., and Mosalam, K. M., (2012). Parameters for shear strength Prediction of exterior beam-column joints without transverse Reinforcement. Engineering Structures 36: 198–209.
[2]
Behnam, H., Kuang, J. S, Bijan, S. (2018). Parametric finite element analysis of RC wide beam column connections, Computers and structures 205: 28-44.
[3]
Ravi, Kiran, and Giovacchino Genesio. (2014). A case study on pre 1970s constructed concrete exterior beam-column joints. Case Studies in Structural Engineering 1: 20-25.
[4]
Masi A, Santarsiero G, Mossucca A, Nigro D. (2014). Influence of axial load on the seismic behavior of RC beam-column joints with wide beam. Applied Mechanics of Materials; Trans Tech Publications 508: 208–214.
[5]
Fadwa I, Ali TA, Nazih E, Sara M. (2014). Reinforced concrete wide and conventional beam–column connections subjected to lateral load. Engineering Structures 76: 34–48.
[6]
Niroomandi, A., Najafgholipour, M. A., Ronagh, H. R. (2014). Numerical investigation of the affecting parameters on the shear failure of Non-ductile RC exterior joints, Engineering Failure Analysis 46: 62-75.
[7]
LaFave, J. M. and Wight, J. K. (2001). Reinforced concrete wide beam-column connections vs. conventional construction: Resistance to lateral earthquake loads. Earthquake Spectra 17: 479-505.
[8]
ABAQUS Analysis user’s manual 6.14-EF (2014). Dassault Systems Simulia Corp. Providence, RI, USA.
[9]
Lubliner J, Oliver J, Oller S, Onate E. (1989). A plastic-damage model for concrete. International Journal of solids and Structures 25: 299–326.
[10]
Kim, J., LaFave, J. M. (2009). Joint Shear Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beam Column Connections subjected to Seismic Lateral Loading. NSEL Report Series.
[11]
Genikomsou, A. S., Polak, M. A. (2015). Finite element analysis of punching shear of concrete slabs using damaged plasticity model in ABAQUS, Engineering Structures 98: 38–48.
[12]
Kim, J., LaFave, J. M. (2007). Key influence parameters for the joint shear behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beam–column connections, Engineering Structures 29: 2523–2539.
[13]
American Concrete Institute (ACI). "Building code requirement for structural concrete and commentary”. Farmington Hills, Michigan. ACI 318-95. 1995.
[14]
ACI 352R-02. (2002). Recommendations for Design of Beam-Column Connections in Monolithic Reinforced Concrete Structures, Reported by Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 352.
[15]
Etemadi E, Fallahnezhad K,. (2017). Behavior of reinforced concrete interior wide beam-column connections under lateral loading: A finite element study. International Journal of Engineering and Technology 9: 2559-2570.
[16]
Shin M, LaFave JM. (2004). Modeling of cyclic joint shear deformation contributions in RC beam–column connections to overall frame behavior. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 18 (5): 645–669.
[17]
Shayanfar, J., Akbarzadeh Bengar, H., Niroomandi, A. (2016). A proposed model for predicting nonlinear behavior of RC joints under seismic loads, Materials and Design 95: 563–579.
[18]
Guo-Lin Wang, Jian-Guo Dai, Teng, J. G. (2012). Shear strength model for RC beam–column joints under seismic loading, Engineering Structures 40: 350–360.
Browse journals by subject