Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2020, Page: 10-19
Hybrid Simulation Framework for Multi-hazard Testing
Elias Strepelias, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
Nikolaos Stathas, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
Xenofon Palios, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
Stathis Bousias, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
Received: Jan. 22, 2020;       Accepted: Feb. 12, 2020;       Published: Mar. 2, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajce.20200801.12      View  312      Downloads  154
Abstract
The design of complicated structures which, under accidental actions, have to fulfill a certain performance level, has been a scientific challenge with social and economic implications, particularly in the field of earthquake engineering. Experimental testing on structures would shed light to the deriving issues, however the full-scaling requirements of the specimens and the most out of date existing laboratory facilities do not facilitate it. For that reason, it is generally proposed the testing structure to be decomposed in its components and the part of scientific interest can be laboratory tested, whereas the other substructures are analytically modelled. That approach is known as hybrid simulation method (HS) and lends itself as an efficient tool in unveiling the nonlinear response of structural systems, especially when testing in full-scale is sought. The present research aims to evaluate the technical aspects of implementing a robust, advanced hybrid simulation (HS) platform, based on technological advancements and combining user friendliness and effectiveness. In addition, the capabilities of the advanced platform pave the way to future research extensions towards studying multi-physics problems beyond the field of earthquake engineering. The good performance of the updated hardware configuration of the new platform was evaluated via a series of verification tests on a pinned steel cantilever column subjected to lateral loading in its elastic and inelastic response region and finally, making use of the advanced application platform as a whole, a hybrid simulation test was carried out on an industrial piping system under earthquake excitation.
Keywords
Hybrid Simulation, Substructures, Control System, Earthquake Engineering, Multi-hazard
To cite this article
Elias Strepelias, Nikolaos Stathas, Xenofon Palios, Stathis Bousias, Hybrid Simulation Framework for Multi-hazard Testing, American Journal of Civil Engineering. Vol. 8, No. 1, 2020, pp. 10-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20200801.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Sextos A. and Bousias S., (2014) Recent advances in real time and hybrid simulation for earthquake engineering purposes. International Conference on “Computational Methods for Engineering Technology”, Naples.
[2]
Palios X., Molina X., Bousias S. N. and Strepelias E., (2007) Testing rate-dependent bridge isolation devices via the pseudodynamic testing method and sub-structuring. 2nd Int Conf on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering, Sanghai, China.
[3]
Bousias S., Kwon O-S, Evangeliou N., Sextos, A. (2014) Implementation issues in distributed hybrid simulation. 6th World Conf. of Structural Control and Monitoring, Barcelona
[4]
Bousias S., Sextos A., Kwon O-S., Taskari O., Elnashai A. Evangeliou N., Di Sarno L. (2017) Intercontinental Hybrid Simulation for the assessment of a three-span R/C highway overpass. Journal of Earthquake Eng., Vol. 23, No. 7, pp. 1194–1215.
[5]
Bousias S. N. (2014) Hybrid Simulation of Stiff Structures: Overview and Current Advances. Journal of Structures, Article 825692, doi: 10.1155/2014/82569.
[6]
Palios X., Strepelias E. and Bousias S. N. (2013) A novel strategy for the hybrid simulation of stiff structures. 5th International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering (AESE), Taipei, Taiwan, November 2013.
[7]
Sextos A., Bousias S,. Taskari O., Evangeliou N., Kwon O.-S., Elnashai A., DiSarno L. and Palios X., (2014) An intercontinental hybrid simulation experiment for the purposes of seismic assessment of a three-span RC bridge. 10th US Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Alaska.
[8]
Stathas N., Skafida S., Bousias S. N., Fardis M. N., Digenis S. & Palios X., (2015) Hybrid simulation of bridge pier uplifting. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Special Issue: “Large scale and on-site structural testing for seismic performance assessment”, 15 (8), pp. 3385-3398.
[9]
Bachynski, E., Chabaud, V. and Sauder, T. (2015) Real-time hybrid model testing of floating wind turbines: sensitivity to limited actuation. Energy Procedia 80: 2 – 12, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.400
[10]
Bachynski, E., Thys, M., Sauder, T., Chabaud, T., and Sæther, L-O. (2016) Real-Time Hybrid Model Testing of a Braceless Semi-Submersible Wind Turbine: Part II — Experimental Results. ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Korea, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2016-54437
[11]
Christenson, R. (2016) Real-time hybrid simulation for Marine Structures. International Workshop “Hybrid 2020 – State of-the-art and future directions for hybrid modelling and simulation”, ETH.
[12]
Wang Y. L., Mosalam K. M., Günay S. and Lu W. S., (2017) Seismic response evaluation of zonal hanging curtain wall system using hybrid simulation. 16th World Conf. on Earthq. Eng., Santiago Chile, paper 1308.
[13]
Nakata N., (2015) Force-based hybrid simulation for expanding capabilities and applications to multi-hazards. EU-US-Asia workshop on hybrid testing, JRC Ispra, October 2015.
[14]
Nakata, N. (2016) Advances in Hybrid Simulation to Coastal Hazard. International Workshop “Hybrid 2020 – State of-the-art and future directions for hybrid modelling and simulation”, ETH.
[15]
Wang, X., Kim, R., Kwon, O-S. and Yeo, I. (2019) Continuous Real-Time Hybrid Simulation Method for Structures Subject to Fire. Journal of Structural Engineering, Volume 145, Issue 12, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002436.
[16]
Whyte C., Mackie K. R. and Stojadinovic Β., (2016) Hybrid Simulation of thermomechanical structural response. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 142 (2).
[17]
Mosalam, K. and Gunay, S. (2014) Seismic performance evaluation of high voltage disconnect switches using real-time hybrid simulation: I. System development and validation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Volume: 43, Issue: 8, p. 1205-1222, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2395.
[18]
Sauder T. (2015) Real-time hybrid testing: envisioned applications (and challenges) in marine technology. EU-US-Asia workshop on hybrid testing, JRC Ispra, October 2015.
[19]
Rodgers, J. E. and Mahin, S. A., (2004) Effects of connection hysteretic degradation on the seismic behavior of steel moment-resisting frames. Berkeley, CA, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Browse journals by subject