Volume 7, Issue 5, September 2019, Page: 126-132
Philosophy and Perception of Beauty in Architecture
Reham Alasmar, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
Received: Oct. 20, 2019;       Accepted: Nov. 12, 2019;       Published: Nov. 20, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajce.20190705.12      View  93      Downloads  54
Definitions of beauty and space are as diverse as defined by the disciplines in which it plays a fundamental role; from science and philosophy to art and architecture, each field’s definition for the perception of the beauty of space is often simplified or reduced. This consequently denies us access new spaces whose definitions and perspectives, strategies and impacts on human perception of beauty of space are rarely considered in any cohesive manner. The debate, “Perception of beauty in Architecture and human perception of space”. The research tries to reflect upon new understanding to the meaning of beauty in architecture and thus access new definitions and understanding to the beauty perspectives, strategies and processes of perception beauty in architecture. Some works of architecture have remarkable aesthetic value. According to certain philosophers, part of this value derives from the appearance of such constructions to fulfill the function for which they were built. The research digs through the dilemma of form follows function and argues that one way of understanding the connection between function and aesthetic value resides in the concept of functional and beauty together not the idea of function vs. beauty; the paper attempts to offer a better way of understanding it.
Aesthetics, Perception, Beauty, Illusion
To cite this article
Reham Alasmar, Philosophy and Perception of Beauty in Architecture, American Journal of Civil Engineering. Special Issue: Aesthetics and Perception of Beauty in Architecture. Vol. 7, No. 5, 2019, pp. 126-132. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20190705.12
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Theory of Phenomenology: Analyzing Substance, Application, and Influence. (2012). Arch 630: Theory and Context.
perception, S. a. (2019, 10). Introductory psychology. Retrieved from Lumenlearning: https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hccc-ss-151-1/chapter/gestalt-principles-of-perception/
West, P. Y. (2017). Space perception. Encyclopaedia britannica.
Coyle, A. (2002). Managing prisons in a time of change. London: International Centre for Prison Studies.
Cladera, A. (2017). The Ultimate Photography Guide to Depth of Field (DoF). Photopills.
Hodges, F. M. (2003). The promised planet: Alliances and struggles of the gerontocracy in American television science fiction of the 1960s.
Akhtaruzzaman, M., & Shafie, A. A. (2011). Geometrical Substantiation of Phi, the Golden Ratio and the Baroque of Nature, Architecture, Design and Engineering. International Journal of Arts.
Kruft, H. (1994). A history of architectural theory from Vitruvius to the present. London.
Botton, A. D. (2008). The architecture of happiness. New York: Vintage books.
Ozkan, S. (2001). Development of Thinking and Theory in Architecture. CSBE.
TMD Studio, (2017). The visual nature of space, Spatial perception and architecture.
l, A. d. (2009). Delight, the Function of Ornament, An Exploration of its Relevance. The Netherlands.
Allen, W. (2013). Hagia Sophia, Istanbul. Arts and Humanities.
Devine, P, G., & Sherman. (1992). Intuitive versus rational judgment and the role of stereotyping in the human condition; kirk or spock, psychological inquiry.
Anthony J. Reilly. (1998). Three approaches to organizational learning. Jsmith library body.
Browse journals by subject