Review Article | | Peer-Reviewed

The Effect of Electric Heavy Vehicles on Flexible Pavements in Australia: A Review

Received: 24 November 2025     Accepted: 5 December 2025     Published: 29 December 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Decarbonisation of heavy vehicles to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions, through the adoption of Zero-Emission Heavy Vehicle (ZEHV) technologies, inevitably influences vehicle typology and axle mass distribution. The additional weight of batteries used in ZEHV systems must be accommodated within existing vehicle mass limits. In Australia, the freight industry is advocating for a minimum one tonne increase in the allowable steer axle load to facilitate greater uptake of electric heavy vehicles. This desktop review investigates the potential effects of a one tonne increase in steer axle load on flexible pavements of both local roads and rural national highways. Currently, there is no nationally standardised methodology for assessing unacceptable pavement wear. This study compares several approaches and concludes that the use of mechanistic-empirical method with weigh-in-motion (WIM) data provides a more accurate assessment of pavement wear than analyses based solely on individual vehicle axles or total vehicle axle loads. The pavement wear analysis indicates that the steer axle contributes the greatest cumulative distress across all pavement types examined. Furthermore, the results show that a one-tonne increase in steer axle load would have a substantially greater impact on local roads- leading to an estimated 31.3% to 48.7% reduction in pavement life- compared with a 20.9% reduction in rural national highways.

Published in American Journal of Civil Engineering (Volume 13, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.15
Page(s) 373-390
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Zero Emission Heavy Vehicle, Decarbonisation, Mass Limit, Axle Load, Steer Axle, Pavement Wear

References
[1] Austroads, Zero emission heavy vehicles and road pavements: Comparing Australia and New Zealand to Europe and North America, Austroads Publication No. AP-R725-25, Sydney, NSW, 2025.
[2] Zhao, H., Wang, Q., Fulton, L., Jaller, M., Burke, A., A comparison of zero-emission highway trucking technologies, Report No. UC-ITS-2017-50, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, California, USA, 2018,
[3] Varin, P., Saarenketo, T., The effect of new tyre type, tyre pressure and axle configurations of heavy trucks on asphalt pavement lifetime, 6th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 2016, pp. 10,
[4] Australian Trucking Association (ATA), Industry-leading partnership to remove electric freight vehicle barriers, 2021,
[5] Australian Trucking Association (ATA) and Electric Vehicle Council (EVC), Urgent reform needed to deliver new era of electric trucks in Australia, Media Releases, 2022, pp. 4,
[6] Australian Trucking Association (ATA) and Electric Vehicle Council (EVC), Electric truck: Keeping shelves stocked in a net zero world, 2022, pp. 21,
[7] Deloitte, Australia’s transition to electric vehicles, NALSPA, Summary report, 2022, pp. 36.
[8] Electric Vehicle Council (EVC), State of electric vehicle 2024, 2024, pp. 72,
[9] International Energy Agency (IEA), Global EV outlook 2024, Moving towards increased affordability, 2024, pp. 174,
[10] Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts (DITRDCA), Heavy vehicle emission standards for cleaner air, Final Regulation Impact Statement, Commonwealth of Australia, 2021, pp. 39.
[11] Bureau of Infrastructure and Transport Research Economics Statistical Report (BITRE), Australian Infrastructure Transport Statistics Yearbook 2024, Australian Government, Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and Arts, 2025, pp. 290.
[12] Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 2021,
[13] Bureau of Infrastructure and Transport Research Economics Statistical Report (BITRE), Australian aggregate freight forecasts – 2022 update (Summary), Commonwealth Australia, 2022.
[14] Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), Survey of motor vehicle use, Australia, 2020, Table 21,
[15] Liimatainen, H., Vliet, O. V., Aplyn, D., The potential of electric trucks – An international commodity level analysis, Applied Energy, 2019, 236, 804-814,
[16] Australian Trucking Association (ATA), Submission to the national EV strategy, 2022, pp. 21.
[17] Austroads, Options for managing the impact of aged heavy vehicles, Austroads Publication No. AP-R637-21, Sydney, NSW, 2021.
[18] Austroads, Austroads guide to pavement technology Part 4K: Selection and design of sprayed seals, Austroads Publication No. AGPT04K-18, Sydney, NSW, 2018,
[19] Austroads, Austroads guide to pavement technology Part 1: Introduction to pavement technology. Austroads Publication No. AGPT01-23, Sydney, NSW, 2023,
[20] Austroads, Guide to pavement technology Part 4B: Asphalt, Austroads Publication No. AGPT04B-25, Sydney, NSW, 2025.
[21] National Transport Commission, Performance-based Standard Scheme – The standards and vehicle assessment rules, National Heavy Vehicle Regulator, 2022, pp. 196,
[22] National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR), Heavy Vehicle National Law (Queensland), 2024.
[23] Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Impact of heavy commercial electric vehicles on flexible pavements, Report No. FHWA-ICT-25-003, 2025, pp. 211,
[24] Hernandez, J., Jayme, A., Huaman, J. J. C., Al-Qadi, I., Effect of heavy-duty electric vehicles on tire-pavement contact forces, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 2025,
[25] Chen, H. H., Connell, R. B., Hudson, W. R., Lytton, R. L., Marshek, R. M., Middleton, D., Roberts, F. L., Sarak, C. L., Tielking, Effects of truck tire pressures on pavements, Cooperative Research Study 372/386, University of Texas, Austin, USA, 1987, pp. 14,
[26] Hajek, J. J., Agarwal, A. C., Influence of axle group spacing on pavement damage, Transportation Research Record 1286, National Research Council, Washington, D. C., 1990, 138-149,
[27] Gillespie, T. D., Karamihas, S. M., Heavy truck properties significant to pavement damage, ASTM Symposia Paper, 1994, 52-63.
[28] Al-Qadi, I. L., Yoo, P. J., Elseifi, M. A., Janajreh, I., Chehab, G., Collop, A., Effects of tire configurations on pavement damage, Asphalt Paving Technology: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Proceedings of the Technical Sessions, 2005, 74, 921-961.
[29] Al-Qadi, I. L., Wang, H., Pavement damage due to different tire and loading configurations on secondary roads, USDOT Region V Regional University Transportation Center Final Report, NEXTRANS Project No: 008IY01, Illinois Center for Transportation, 2009, pp. 65,
[30] Austroads, Relative pavement wear of an unbound granular pavement due to dual and single tyres, Austroads technical report, Austroads Publication No. AP-T104/08, Sydney, NSW, 2008.
[31] Varin, P., Saarenketo, T., Effect of axle and tyre configurations on pavement durability – A prestudy, ROADEX Network for better rural road, Report 2014, 2014, pp. 54,
[32] Austroads, National steer axle mass limits, Austroads publication No. AP-R505-16, Sydney, NSW, 2016.
[33] Arshad, A. K., Haron, H. A., Rahman, Z. A., Halim, A. G. A., Pavement response to variable tyre pressure of heavy vehicles, MATEC Web Conferences 47, EDP Sciences, 2016,
[34] Harvey, J., Saboori, A., Miller, M., Kim, C., Jaller, M., Lea, J., Kendall, A., Saboori, A., Effects of increased weights of alternative fuel trucks on pavements and bridges (No. UC-ITS-202-19; ITS Reports). US Office of the President: University of California Institute of Transportation Studies, 2020, pp. 99,
[35] National Waste & Recycling Association (NW&RA), Electric vehicle truck weights, 2023, pp. 4,
[36] Varin, P., Saarenketo, T., Evaluating tyre configurations, including tyre pressure, in consideration of the introduction of heavier vehicles on the Swedish Road Network, Roadscanners, 2018.
[37] Williamson, S., Takeuchi, S., HVIA 838 – Vehicle specifications envelopes for three common PBS vehicles, Final report for National Heavy Vehicle Regulator by Advantia Transport Consulting, Document number: ATC3214-Report-02-01, 2024, pp. 57,
[38] Saliko, D., Erlingsson, S., Damage investigation of thin flexible pavements to longer heavier vehicle loading through instrumented road sections and numerical calculations, Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2021, 22(S1), S575-S591,
[39] National Transport Commission (NTC), Performance based standards 2.0: discussion paper, NTC, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2022,
[40] Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Comprehensive truck size and weight limits study, Volume 1: Technical reports summary, 2015, pp. 92,
[41] Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Comprehensive truck size and weight limits study, Pavement comparative analysis technical report, US Department of Transportation, 2015, pp. 132,
[42] Australian Trucking Association (ATA), House of representatives standing committee on climate change, energy, environment and water – Inquiry into the transition to electric vehicles, 2024, pp. 14,
[43] Australian Trucking Association (ATA), Truck impact chart, Technical advisory procedure, Edition 3, 2024, pp. 25,
[44] Austroads, Guide to pavement technology Part 2: Pavement Structural Design. Austroads Publication No. AGPT02-17, Sydney, NSW, 2017.
[45] Department for Transport, UK, Guidance HGV maximum weights, 2010,
[46] Transportstyrelsen, Gross weight tables, 2020,
[47] Liimatainen, H., Pollananen, M., Nykanen, L., Impacts of increasing maximum truck weight – case Finland. European Transport Research Review, 2020, 12(14),
[48] Austroads, Pavement wear assessment method for PBS vehicles, Austroads research report, Austroads Publication No. AP-R372/11, Sydney, NSW, 2011.
[49] Rhodes, A. H., Road damage and the vehicle, Endeavour, 7(1), 41-46,
[50] National Transport Commission (NTC), Review of equivalent standards axle values used in PAYGO model, Project No. 20-497, 2021, pp. 109, Melbourne, Australia,
[51] Chatti, K., Salama, H., El Mokhtar, Effect of heavy trucks with large axle groups on asphalt pavement damage, 8th International Symposium on heavy vehicle weights and dimensions, 2004, pp. 10, Muldersdrift, South Africa,
[52] Department of Transport and Main Road (DTMR), Guide to traffic impact assessment, Practice Note: Pavement impact assessment, 2018, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia,
[53] Low, J. M., Haszeldine, R. S., Harrison, G. P., The hidden cost of road maintenance due to the increase weight of battery and hydrogen trucks and buses – a perspective, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2023, 25, 757-770,
[54] Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Comprehensive truck size and weight limits study, Report to Congress, US Department of Transportation, 2016, pp. 28,
[55] VicRoads, Code of Practice RC 500.22, Selection and design of pavements and surfacings, Melbourne, Victoria, 2018, pp. 33,
[56] Matthews, S., Mulholland, P., Thickness design of concrete residential roads, Proceedings 17th ARRB Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland, Proceeding Part 4, 17, 173-186.
[57] Haddock, J. E., North American Perspective, Transportation Research Board: Anticipated truck loadings in pavement design – Part II, Purdue University, 2024,
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Chua, B. T., Nepal, K. P. (2025). The Effect of Electric Heavy Vehicles on Flexible Pavements in Australia: A Review. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 13(6), 373-390. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Chua, B. T.; Nepal, K. P. The Effect of Electric Heavy Vehicles on Flexible Pavements in Australia: A Review. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 2025, 13(6), 373-390. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Chua BT, Nepal KP. The Effect of Electric Heavy Vehicles on Flexible Pavements in Australia: A Review. Am J Civ Eng. 2025;13(6):373-390. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.15,
      author = {Boon Tiong Chua and Kali Prasad Nepal},
      title = {The Effect of Electric Heavy Vehicles on Flexible Pavements in Australia: A Review},
      journal = {American Journal of Civil Engineering},
      volume = {13},
      number = {6},
      pages = {373-390},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajce.20251306.15},
      abstract = {Decarbonisation of heavy vehicles to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions, through the adoption of Zero-Emission Heavy Vehicle (ZEHV) technologies, inevitably influences vehicle typology and axle mass distribution. The additional weight of batteries used in ZEHV systems must be accommodated within existing vehicle mass limits. In Australia, the freight industry is advocating for a minimum one tonne increase in the allowable steer axle load to facilitate greater uptake of electric heavy vehicles. This desktop review investigates the potential effects of a one tonne increase in steer axle load on flexible pavements of both local roads and rural national highways. Currently, there is no nationally standardised methodology for assessing unacceptable pavement wear. This study compares several approaches and concludes that the use of mechanistic-empirical method with weigh-in-motion (WIM) data provides a more accurate assessment of pavement wear than analyses based solely on individual vehicle axles or total vehicle axle loads. The pavement wear analysis indicates that the steer axle contributes the greatest cumulative distress across all pavement types examined. Furthermore, the results show that a one-tonne increase in steer axle load would have a substantially greater impact on local roads- leading to an estimated 31.3% to 48.7% reduction in pavement life- compared with a 20.9% reduction in rural national highways.},
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Effect of Electric Heavy Vehicles on Flexible Pavements in Australia: A Review
    AU  - Boon Tiong Chua
    AU  - Kali Prasad Nepal
    Y1  - 2025/12/29
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.15
    T2  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    SP  - 373
    EP  - 390
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8737
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.15
    AB  - Decarbonisation of heavy vehicles to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions, through the adoption of Zero-Emission Heavy Vehicle (ZEHV) technologies, inevitably influences vehicle typology and axle mass distribution. The additional weight of batteries used in ZEHV systems must be accommodated within existing vehicle mass limits. In Australia, the freight industry is advocating for a minimum one tonne increase in the allowable steer axle load to facilitate greater uptake of electric heavy vehicles. This desktop review investigates the potential effects of a one tonne increase in steer axle load on flexible pavements of both local roads and rural national highways. Currently, there is no nationally standardised methodology for assessing unacceptable pavement wear. This study compares several approaches and concludes that the use of mechanistic-empirical method with weigh-in-motion (WIM) data provides a more accurate assessment of pavement wear than analyses based solely on individual vehicle axles or total vehicle axle loads. The pavement wear analysis indicates that the steer axle contributes the greatest cumulative distress across all pavement types examined. Furthermore, the results show that a one-tonne increase in steer axle load would have a substantially greater impact on local roads- leading to an estimated 31.3% to 48.7% reduction in pavement life- compared with a 20.9% reduction in rural national highways.
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections