American Journal of Civil Engineering

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Case Report |

BIM-Based Approach to Reduce GHG Emissions in Construction

The construction sector is responsible for a substantial portion of the country's total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Several problems, such as global warming, environmental degradation, unpredictable weather patterns, etc., are caused by higher levels of carbon emission, which is a major cause for concern. Massive amounts of greenhouse gases are produced during the construction process due to the manufacturing, transportation, and utilization of materials as well as the high energy demands of the building's construction processes. The emission of these gases is a factor in climate change. In this study, the phases that release the most carbon into the atmosphere were analyzed alongside the sources of carbon dioxide emissions from construction materials. Building Information Modelling (BIM) has been used for several reasons in projects, including 3D visualization, the preparation of project requirements, and so on. In this research, a BIM-based approach has been conducted to model a proposed building. Then a software-based analysis has been used for the evaluation of carbon emission from the materials. The study's outcome satisfies its aim by assessing the carbon emissions of the entire structure, and the roof and walls as the maximum carbon emitting component with 4272.92 tons of CO2 and 152.18 tCO2. The findings of the research indicate a decrease in carbon emissions from the roof and wall by material modifications to C40/50-50% GGBS and Steel-Hollow Sections. Adopting such material modification will enable structures to be constructed successfully and becoming a lower ecological contributor to carbon emissions is achievable.

GHG, BIM, Building

APA Style

Abdullah, F., Safa, N. S. (2024). BIM-Based Approach to Reduce GHG Emissions in Construction. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20241201.11

ACS Style

Abdullah, F.; Safa, N. S. BIM-Based Approach to Reduce GHG Emissions in Construction. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 2024, 12(1), 1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20241201.11

AMA Style

Abdullah F, Safa NS. BIM-Based Approach to Reduce GHG Emissions in Construction. Am J Civ Eng. 2024;12(1):1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20241201.11

Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. R. Chandrappa, S. Gupta, and U. C. Kulshrestha, Coping with Climate Change: Principles and Asian Context. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
2. K. Halsnæs et al., “Framing issues,” in Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
3. O. US EPA, “Causes of Climate Change,” Apr. 15, 2021. https://www.epa.gov/climatechange-science/causes-climate-change (accessed Sep. 14, 2022).
4. L. Meyer, S. Brinkman, L. van Kesteren, N. Leprince-Ringuet, and F. van Boxmeer, “Technical Support Unit for the Synthesis Report,” p. 169.
5. C. K. Chau, T. M. Leung, and W. Y. Ng, “A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings,” Appl. Energy, vol. 143, pp. 395–413, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.023.
6. S. Anowar, Md. F. Rakib, R. Hasan, and M. Rahman, “Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions in building construction: A case study of SWC building at Kuet in Bangladesh,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag. Innov., vol. 2, pp. 215–229, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.31462/jcemi.2019.04215229.
7. Y. H. Dong and S. T. Ng, “A life cycle assessment model for evaluating the environmental impacts of building construction in Hong Kong,” Build. Environ., vol. 89, pp. 183–191, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.020.
8. Y. H. Dong and S. T. Ng, “Comparing the midpoint and endpoint approaches based on ReCiPe—a study of commercial buildings in Hong Kong,” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1409–1423, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11367-014-0743-0.
9. V. J. L. Gan, J. C. P. Cheng, I. M. C. Lo, and C. M. Chan, “Developing a CO2-e accounting method for quantification and analysis of embodied carbon in high-rise buildings,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 141, pp. 825–836, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.126.
10. S. Xing, Z. Xu, and G. Jun, “Inventory analysis of LCA on steel- and concrete-construction office buildings,” Energy Build., vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1188–1193, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.10.016.
11. M. Suzuki and T. Oka, “Estimation of life cycle energy consumption and CO2 emission of office buildings in Japan,” Energy Build., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 33–41, Aug. 1998, doi: 10.1016/S0378-7788(98)00010-3.
12. N. Shafiq, Muhd. F. Nurrudin, S. S. S. Gardezi, and A. B. Kamaruzzaman, “Carbon footprint assessment of a typical low rise office building in Malaysia using building information modelling (BIM),” Int. J. Sustain. Build. Technol. Urban Dev., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 157–172, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1080/2093761X.2015.1057876.
13. H. Yan, Q. Shen, L. C. H. Fan, Y. Wang, and L. Zhang, “Greenhouse gas emissions in building construction: A case study of One Peking in Hong Kong,” Build. Environ., vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 949–955, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.09.014.
14. M. J. González and J. García Navarro, “Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact,” Build. Environ., vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 902–909, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.04.006.
15. W.-M.-S. Wan Omar, J.-H. Doh, and K. Panuwatwanich, “Variations in embodied energy and carbon emission intensities of construction materials,” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., vol. 49, pp. 31–48, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.06.003.
16. K. A. Al-Sallal, “Energy and carbon emissions of buildings,” in Low Energy Low Carbon Architecture, CRC Press, 2016.
17. “Decision criteria for selecting air source heat pump technology in UK low carbon housing: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management: Vol 23, No 6.” https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09537325.2011.585030 (accessed Sep. 07, 2022).
18. W. M. Matipa, P. Cunnigham, and B. Naik, “Assessing the impact of new rules of cost planning on BIM schema pertinent to quantity surveying practice,” in Proceedings 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, Leeds, UK, Sep. 2010, vol. 1, pp. 625–632. Accessed: Sep. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/3346/
19. I. Motawa and K. Carter, “Sustainable BIM-based Evaluation of Buildings,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 74, pp. 419–428, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.015.
20. Z. Luo, L. Yang, and J. Liu, “Embodied carbon emissions of office building: A case study of China’s 78 office buildings,” Build. Environ., vol. 95, pp. 365–371, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.09.018.
21. X.-J. Li, J. Lai, C. Ma, and C. Wang, “Using BIM to research carbon footprint during the materialization phase of prefabricated concrete buildings: A China study,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 279, p. 123454, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123454.
22. “CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita) - Bangladesh | Data.” https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC?locations=BD (accessed Sep. 14, 2022).
23. DavidVeld, “CarboLifeCalc.” Jul. 06, 2022. Accessed: Sep. 15, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/DavidVeld/CarboLifeCalc
24. “Cement and Concrete: The Environmental Impact,” PSCI. https://psci.princeton.edu/tips/2020/11/3/cement-and-concrete-the-environmental-impact (accessed Sep. 15, 2022).